Congrats to Dan. Linda and Dan got a consulting gig for a community college out in the west. Mostly amazingly, they mostly used what they learn in System Arch, SD stuff to win the contract. I guess this concludes a little to this Sergey's post. This stuff can be useful in some situations. I'd still have to say, in some remote situation, such as the west ;).
It seems they can get busy in the next couple of months and most likely to September.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
3 comments:
Ben -- thank you for supporting my argument.
the dilemma here, as it seem to me, is how direct the applicability need to be for the methods to be useful. I think Crawley covered it by "this class is not about what to think, but how to think"-- so, not sure if even he would claim universal applicability for his methods. But thinking about systems holistically and methodically is not a bad idea in any situation (but naturally is a subject to personal interpretations...)
Yes, I also think Crawley's stuff would be useful if you are not doing something that needs to have effect rather soon. Something like Dan's project is a fit for that stuff. Also, the his presentation to the Senate about NASA's problem stuff he mentioned in today's class.
For start-ups, probably not. Do you really think I'll give OPM to my customers? You can try to apply some stuff in Verizon, maybe.
All in all, time will tell.
oh no... I would not share an OPM with anybody. No support for OPM from me.
Even if OPM had benefits over other diagrams (which I do not think it does), it is not widely accepted, so it is not a good tool to communicate. For something like this, I would prefer something more common and natural to understand (and OPM is neither of those )
Post a Comment